Similar AI Prompts Create Different Results – This Will Confuse Plagiarism Checkers

Plagiarism checkers thwarted. I asked an AI engine to generate content yesterday. One small change in my prompt created a result with a vastly different result, tone and verbiage. Armed with this knowledge, I am arguing plagiarism checkers will not generate consistent results on AI-generated content.

My client has all users logging into their Windows 11 workstations with the same password. Danger, Danger, Danger, I know. I asked perplexity to generate content I can share with the client, promoting creating user-specific passwords.

Cyber Safety Net is your AI solution provider. I am arguing plagiarism checkers will not generate consistent results on AI-generated content.

AI Wins. Plagiarism checkers lose.

My first prompt was

“why should a company with 5 computer users have unique passwords for each user and in under 300 words and include bullet points and in a friendly tone and written from the perspective of a cybersecurity consultant”

The first response was

“As a cybersecurity consultant, I’d strongly recommend unique passwords for each user in your 5-person company. Here’s why, in a friendly and concise manner:

  • Enhanced Security: Unique passwords significantly reduce the risk of a widespread breach. If one password is compromised, only that account is at risk, not your entire system.
  • Accountability: Individual passwords allow you to track who accessed what and when. This is crucial for maintaining data integrity and resolving any issues that may arise.
  • Compliance: Many industries require unique user identification for regulatory compliance, such as HIPAA in healthcare.
    Easier Management: While it might seem simpler to have one password, individual accounts actually make it easier to manage access rights and revoke them when needed.
  • Personal Responsibility: Users tend to be more careful with their own unique passwords, leading to better overall security practices.
    Flexibility: Different access levels can be assigned to different users based on their roles and needs.

To make this manageable, consider:

  • Implementing a password manager for your team
  • Using multi-factor authentication for an extra layer of security
  • Creating a clear password policy that everyone understands and follows Remember, good cybersecurity is about layers of protection. Unique passwords are a simple yet effective layer that can significantly boost your company’s digital defenses. It’s a small change that can make a big difference in protecting your valuable data and systems.”

My second prompt requested only 5 bullet points

“why should a company with 5 computer users have unique passwords for each user and in under 300 words and include 5 bullet points and in a friendly tone and written from the perspective of a cybersecurity consultant”

The second response was vastly different

“Hey there! As a cybersecurity consultant, I’m excited to share why unique passwords for each of your 5 users are a game-changer for your company’s security. Let’s dive into the top reasons:

  • Fortress-like Protection: Unique passwords act like individual locks for each user. If one lock gets picked, the others stay secure. This means a single compromised password won’t give hackers the keys to your entire kingdom!
  • Sherlock-Level Tracking: With unique passwords, you can easily track who did what and when. It’s like having a digital detective on your team, helping you solve any mysterious activities quickly and efficiently.
  • Regulation High-Five: Many industry regulations love unique passwords. By implementing them, you’re not just boosting security, you’re also giving a thumbs up to compliance requirements. It’s a win-win!
  • Personal Security Superheroes: When users have their own passwords, they tend to become more security-conscious. It’s like giving each team member their own superhero cape – they’ll feel more responsible for protecting their digital identity.
  • Flexible Access Control: Unique passwords allow you to tailor access levels for each user. It’s like having a VIP list for your data – you decide who gets the all-access pass and who gets the standard ticket.

Remember, implementing unique passwords doesn’t have to be a headache. Password managers can make this process smooth and simple for everyone.”

Small change

All I did was request 5 bullet points. The result is vastly different. My proposals do not promise “Fortress-like Protection,” “Sherlock-Level Tracking” and “Regulation High-Five.” I may submit the second result to a teacher or academic journal while someone else submits the first result. No teacher could accuse the students of copying each other. The tone is widely divergent.

I ran the second prompt again this morning. Widely divergent results, again. Seeing that we get widely divergent results, teachers and academic journals cannot generate sufficient evidence for plagiarism. Prompts are highly similar. Results are not. AI wins. Plagiarism checkers lose.

More

AI ain’t so tough. See https://cybersafetynet.net/category/ai/ to help understand and use Artificial intelligence.

Tags: